Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations IamaSherpa on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

LEVEL OF REAL_TIME PROTECTION VS SLOW PROCESS

Status
Not open for further replies.

BFClem

IS-IT--Management
Sep 17, 2001
62
US
My first post to this forum, thanks.

Understand the paranoia! Last September-October, our small company (11 users) paid over $5000 in IT time due to Nimda et al. What a pain. Our live update missed by a few hours or we may have been protected by NAVCE 7.5.

In retrospect, our IT consultants made things so much more complicated hat they had to be.

Anyway, after I threw them out and assumed control of matters, here is what I did.

1. Turned off the back-up domain controller; the PDC has raid 5 and tapes, why need a BDC? It also became corrupted.

2. Eradicated anything that had to do with Exchange server and returned to my easy to manage, non-virus spreading client-server e-mail program from Captaris (formerly Infinite Technologies)on both the server (Interchange) and client sides (Express-it 2000).

3. Re-did all clients to managed NAVCE with lunch-time auto-scans.

Now, at most, an e-mail ends up in quanratine during over-night scanning and is erased. Even Klez did ZERO damage (so far).

Here is the question:

Our programs are a server-side DOS-based piece that runs in a CMD window on the client, the aforementioned e-mail, internet using IE6 through proxy server over T1, and some local programs like labels and Crystal.

How much real-time protection do we need to run to be secure without slowing down the service? As it is, we are excluding the DOS piece from real-time.

Thanks for following along,

Brad







 
BFClem,

I would definitely recommend continuing to run real time protection, it is always better to catch a virus before it can execute than to catch it on a lunch time scan after it has already spread. Also #1 seems a little hasty, it is ALWAYS a good idea to have a BDC. I mean how happy would these 11 people be if the motherboard on your PDC goes and they are unable to logon to the network until it can be repaired. Your BDC does not have to be an expensive server, it can be an old machine that is setup just in case.
 
Epohl,
Thanks for the sound advise.
Brad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top