Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

KX-TES824 installed behind an existing PBX(HOST)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Otoni

Technical User
Jun 18, 2012
224
UG
I have a KX-TES824 installed behind an existing KX-TES824 as HOST as CLEARLY DESCRIBED in the feature manual Page 48

"This PBX can be installed behind an existing host PBX. This is performed by connecting extension jacks of the host PBX to outside (CO) line ports of this PBX".

In other words, the two are interconnected and everything works just fine.

The trouble is, when you dial from any extension the Slave PBX the the Operator always shows the the extension number of the port that connects the HOST to the CO input of the slave.

Is there some way to make the true extension numbers of Extensions on Slave PBX show on the HOST PBX side?

Suggestions will be highly appreciated



 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top