MasterRacker
New member
I was reading something a few weeks ago that I don't seem to have a hope of finding again. It was either in a newsletter or a website somewhere (I know... ).
The author was referencing "typical" workload in reference to server sprawl in larger companies. They stated that MYSQL and Oracle shops typically host a hundreds to thousands of DBs per server while SQL Server, while getting better, typically only has a few hundred per server.
Does this ring any bells with anyone?
Jeff
[small][purple]It's never too early to begin preparing for [/purple]International Talk Like a Pirate Day
"The software I buy sucks, The software I write sucks. It's time to give up and have a beer..." - Me[/small]
The author was referencing "typical" workload in reference to server sprawl in larger companies. They stated that MYSQL and Oracle shops typically host a hundreds to thousands of DBs per server while SQL Server, while getting better, typically only has a few hundred per server.
Does this ring any bells with anyone?
Jeff
[small][purple]It's never too early to begin preparing for [/purple]International Talk Like a Pirate Day
"The software I buy sucks, The software I write sucks. It's time to give up and have a beer..." - Me[/small]