I was wondering if anyone could offer an overview of post-split administration of an Access DB. I'm facing doing my first split and I've read enough about the process of how and why to do it to feel confidant, but I'm having a hard time envisioning what it's like to make changes to the database after the split--like when someone comes along and decides they want a new report, or a new search option on the main form.
Could someone tell me if I have this right:
1. I split the DB using the database utility. I wind up with a front end and back end.
2. I put the back end out on the network, and deliver (let's say I send it via email) the front end to my users. I can then make changes at individual workstations, i.e, a manager's delete button is visible but maybe their staff doesn't have access to the same button.
3. I keep a copy of the front end in some safe place. This is my master copy. Should someone decide they want a new report, I add it to my master copy of my front end and then redistribute the front end to the users via email and make sure they overwrite their old copy.
4. If someone decides, which they absolutely won't, because we've fully covered this at this point and everyone understands that it's in our best interest to get the data right before we go live (right? right???) I make the change to the back end, whatever changes are necessary to the front end, and the redistribute.
Basically I have a master copy of the front end I hold and make changes to, probably a copy of the back end as well just so I have a back up of relationships, and I make changes and redistribute as needed.
Do I have this right, and are there any issues, logistical or otherwise, I might be missing?
Thanks for all insights & advice.
Could someone tell me if I have this right:
1. I split the DB using the database utility. I wind up with a front end and back end.
2. I put the back end out on the network, and deliver (let's say I send it via email) the front end to my users. I can then make changes at individual workstations, i.e, a manager's delete button is visible but maybe their staff doesn't have access to the same button.
3. I keep a copy of the front end in some safe place. This is my master copy. Should someone decide they want a new report, I add it to my master copy of my front end and then redistribute the front end to the users via email and make sure they overwrite their old copy.
4. If someone decides, which they absolutely won't, because we've fully covered this at this point and everyone understands that it's in our best interest to get the data right before we go live (right? right???) I make the change to the back end, whatever changes are necessary to the front end, and the redistribute.
Basically I have a master copy of the front end I hold and make changes to, probably a copy of the back end as well just so I have a back up of relationships, and I make changes and redistribute as needed.
Do I have this right, and are there any issues, logistical or otherwise, I might be missing?
Thanks for all insights & advice.