The age of your system makes a difference.
It is NOT true that the IDE bus runs at the speed of the slowest device, UNLESS
- your system was built sometime before 1998
[tab]OR
- you have a device that uses PIO Mode
Back then, IDT (Independent Device Timing) wasn't around. IDT is what allows you to mix UDMA modes on the same IDE channel. For example, you could have an ATA/33 (CD-ROM) and an ATA/100 (hard drive) device running at their own speeds on the same channel.
PIO Mode has to use the CPU to access main memory, unlike DMA (Direct Memory Access). If a PIO Mode and ATA device share the same channel, both will run in the slower mode. Most early CD-ROMs only ran in PIO Mode, which is why you hear so many people telling you not to do it. Not many old school techies realize that most CD/DVD-ROM devices today use UDMA mode 2 (ATA/33) with IDT.
Read my last post in this thread for links:
thread751-437954
Next point...
It IS true, however, that transfers between devices on the same channel would be much slower than if they were on different channels. That goes for hard drives, optical devices, and a mix of the two regardless of what UDMA mode they're running at.
Therefore, the best configuration to have depends on your situation. Some peeps like to do a lot of CD-to-CD copying. In such a case, it would make more sense to have the CD-ROM share the Primary IDE with the hard drive, and place the CD Burner on the secondary by itself.
With SATA and PCI IDE controller cards, all this is in the past...
~cdogg
[tab]"All paid jobs absorb and degrade the mind";
[tab][tab]- Aristotle
[tab][navy]For general rules and guidelines to get better answers, click here:[/navy] faq219-2884