IDC Table and RDB

[ramtel]

I had an IDC table in LD 49 that I removed. Is there anything in the RDB in LD 16 that I need to "X" out? If so, can some one print the steps?

Thx

 

[ramtel]

Here is the route in question:

ld 21
PT1000

REQ: PRT
TYPE: RDB
CUST 0
ROUT 5

TYPE RDB
CUST 00
ROUT 5
DES ELB DIDS
TKTP DID
M911_ANI NO
M911_TONE NO
NPID_TBL_NUM 0
SAT NO
RCLS EXT
VTRK NO
NODE
DTRK YES
BRIP NO
DGTP PRI
ISDN YES
MODE PRA
IFC NI2
CBCR NO
NCOS 0
SBN NO
PNI 00000
NCNA YES
NCRD NO
CHTY BCH
CPFXS YES
CPUB OFF
DAPC NO
BCOT 0
INTC NO
DSEL 3VCE
PTYP PRI
AUTO NO
DNIS NO
DCDR NO
ICOG IAO
RANX NO
SRCH LIN
TRMB YES
STEP
ACOD 8015
TCPP NO
PII NO
TARG 08
CLEN 1
BILN NO
OABS
INST
IDC NO
DCNO 1 *
NDNO 1
DEXT NO
ICIS YES
TIMR ICF 512
OGF 512
EOD 13952
NRD 10112
DDL 70
ODT 4096
RGV 640
FLH 510
GRD 896
SFB 3


PAGE 002

NBS 2048
NBL 4096

IENB 5
VSS 0
VGD 6
DRNG NO
CDR YES
INC YES
LAST NO
QREC NO
OAL YES
AIA YES
OAN YES
OPD YES
CDRX NO
NATL YES
VRAT NO
MUS YES
MRT 11
EQAR NO
FRL 0 0
FRL 1 0
FRL 2 0
FRL 3 0
FRL 4 0
FRL 5 0
FRL 6 0
FRL 7 0
OHQ NO
OHQT 00
TDET NO
TTBL 0
ATAN NO
PLEV 2
MCTS NO
ALRM NO
ART 0
SGRP 0
ARDN NO
AACR NO

REQ:

I think the DCNO entry needs to be changed/outed. Is that right?

 

[GHTROUT]

These refer to IDC

DCNO 1 *
NDNO 1

~~
Gene at GHTROUT.com

 

[ramtel]

There was only one IDC table in LD 49 and I removed it already. Can I removed the reference number "1" from those parameters? And how?

Having the "1" there, would it affect incoming caller id info not being displayed on the LCD screen?

 

[KCFLHRC]

You should have removed the reference in the RDB before you removed it in LD 49

 

[ramtel]

I can put the IDC table back up and then go back to the RDB and "x" out the idc reference number. Correct?

 

[janaya]

but putting IDC=No removes the routes reference to the IDC table. Either way you should be fine.

John Anaya
Signet6 Network Sciences
ACSS/ACIS - CS1000 Rls 7.5/Call Pilot 5
ACSS/ACIS - SME - IP Office 8.0
APSS/APDS - Avaya UC Services

Public Profile

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-anaya/25/1b9/a9b/Edit

 

[KCFLHRC]

You may just be able to "x" it out now without putting it back in. But the correct procedure would have been to remove it off of the route first. This has been known to cause Data Corruption when modifying an active IDC table.

 

[ramtel]

OK, Thanks janaya. I am having a problem with incoming caller id info not being displayed on anyone's phone. Just making sure these changes aren't the cause.

 

[janaya]

Is this a new problem? Was Caller ID working yesterday and not working today? Is this a new circuit?

John Anaya
Signet6 Network Sciences
ACSS/ACIS - CS1000 Rls 7.5/Call Pilot 5
ACSS/ACIS - SME - IP Office 8.0
APSS/APDS - Avaya UC Services

Public Profile

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/john-anaya/25/1b9/a9b/Edit

 

[ramtel]

Yes, it was working yesterday. The circuit is new, installed on Feb 22.