MacroScope
Programmer
I have an Access2007/SQL Server 2012 system with 20 users for an insurance company. Checks to our dealer network are currently being written manually in Quick Books, even though the amount to be paid is determined within Access. I've been asked to use an Access report to print the checks, table the data, and then export it back to QB so that our accounting matches checks written.
I've got a table that reflects just the records to be printed, but I need a way to sequentially number each record in the new table beginning with a user generated starting point equivalent to the first check number.
The check blanks are on standard letter sized paper, three to a page, with tear-off perforations to separate them, in case that information has any relevance.
I'm not sure if the best way to accomplish this is from the report itself. I've created a blank field on each table record for the check number, and what seems most logical is that the sequential number is generated on print and written back to the table, rather than just generating all the numbers at once within the table. That way, should print ever be interrupted, it will be easy to take up where we left off. However, whatever way makes most sense is what I'm interested in. If generating them all within the table is more logical it's fine with me.
All help will be greatly appreciated.
I've got a table that reflects just the records to be printed, but I need a way to sequentially number each record in the new table beginning with a user generated starting point equivalent to the first check number.
The check blanks are on standard letter sized paper, three to a page, with tear-off perforations to separate them, in case that information has any relevance.
I'm not sure if the best way to accomplish this is from the report itself. I've created a blank field on each table record for the check number, and what seems most logical is that the sequential number is generated on print and written back to the table, rather than just generating all the numbers at once within the table. That way, should print ever be interrupted, it will be easy to take up where we left off. However, whatever way makes most sense is what I'm interested in. If generating them all within the table is more logical it's fine with me.
All help will be greatly appreciated.