HSRP and EIGRP

[zinkann]

I am testing an HSRP configuration on two 4506s. I have a group of SVIs running HSRP between the two 4506s with a trunk carrying my normal vlans as well as the new group of SVIs. My question is do i need to have them included in the trunk? I am also running EIGRP because i have several switches in layer 3 that connect back to the 4506s. On 4506-2 the routing is huge. For every SVI that is on 4506-1, it has a network learned from the HSRP SVIs. 4506-2 only has the SVIs running HSRP, no other SVIs.
Any suggestions as to why i have these "redundant" routes in my routing table or is this typical with HSRP.

ex: The 200-203 are the SVIs running HSRP.

D 10.0.27.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.0.203.2, 1d00h, Vlan203
[90/3072] via 10.0.201.2, 1d00h, Vlan201
[90/3072] via 10.0.200.2, 1d00h, Vlan200
[90/3072] via 10.0.0.1, 1d00h, Vlan1
D 10.0.24.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.0.203.2, 1d00h, Vlan203
[90/3072] via 10.0.201.2, 1d00h, Vlan201
[90/3072] via 10.0.200.2, 1d00h, Vlan200
[90/3072] via 10.0.0.1, 1d00h, Vlan1
D 10.0.30.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.0.203.2, 1d00h, Vlan203
[90/3072] via 10.0.201.2, 1d00h, Vlan201
[90/3072] via 10.0.200.2, 1d00h, Vlan200
[90/3072] via 10.0.0.1, 1d00h, Vlan1
D 10.0.28.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.0.203.2, 1d00h, Vlan203
[90/3072] via 10.0.201.2, 1d00h, Vlan201
[90/3072] via 10.0.200.2, 1d00h, Vlan200
[90/3072] via 10.0.0.1, 1d00h, Vlan1
D 10.0.29.0/24 [90/3072] via 10.0.203.2, 1d00h, Vlan203
[90/3072] via 10.0.201.2, 1d00h, Vlan201
[90/3072] via 10.0.200.2, 1d00h, Vlan200
[90/3072] via 10.0.0.1, 1d00h, Vlan1

CCNA, Network+

 

[zinkann]

i might have figured it out. I have a bunch of SVIs on the Core1 4506 that aren't on the Core2. I am in the process of moving those remaining SVIs to the routed access layer. so Core1 is advertising those SVI networks using 10.0.0.1 and the test hsrp SVIs. Can someone please confirm?

CCNA, Network+