jimfranklin
IS-IT--Management
Hi,
I have a LH4 with 12 x 36gb drives.
I have set up as 5 x raid 1 mirrors + 2 hotswap drives. across the 2 raid channels.
My question is this.
For maximum performance should I have each half of the mirror drives on one controller like this...
Channel 0: D: (1st mirror)
E: (1st "
F: (1st "
G: (1st "
H: (1st "
* hotswap 1
Channel 1: D: (2st mirror)
E: (2st "
F: (2st "
G: (2st "
H: (2st "
* hotswap 2
or have the mirror pairs together on the same channels like this...
Channel 0: C: (1st mirror)
C: (2nd "
D: (1st "
D: (1st "
E: (1st "
* hotswap
Channel 0: E: (1st mirror)
F: (2nd "
F: (1st "
G: (1st "
G: (1st "
* hotswap
Which is likely to perform faster - we need to have the disks in raid 1 mirrors and many volumes because of the database access style.
Thanks in advance
Jim
I have a LH4 with 12 x 36gb drives.
I have set up as 5 x raid 1 mirrors + 2 hotswap drives. across the 2 raid channels.
My question is this.
For maximum performance should I have each half of the mirror drives on one controller like this...
Channel 0: D: (1st mirror)
E: (1st "
F: (1st "
G: (1st "
H: (1st "
* hotswap 1
Channel 1: D: (2st mirror)
E: (2st "
F: (2st "
G: (2st "
H: (2st "
* hotswap 2
or have the mirror pairs together on the same channels like this...
Channel 0: C: (1st mirror)
C: (2nd "
D: (1st "
D: (1st "
E: (1st "
* hotswap
Channel 0: E: (1st mirror)
F: (2nd "
F: (1st "
G: (1st "
G: (1st "
* hotswap
Which is likely to perform faster - we need to have the disks in raid 1 mirrors and many volumes because of the database access style.
Thanks in advance
Jim