Hi everyone!
Latest MAS release + MCD 5.0.
It's our first MAS/NP installation but we installed successfully many other standalone NPs before. The traditional way to setup NP VM ports on 3300 was to take IP User licenses for each port as 5020/5240 IP set.
Per example, if we had 9 NP VM ports and 52 users, we would have 61 IP User licenses on AMC and 61 IP User licenses in "License & Option Selection form" on 3300.
However, with the MAS, we have those MCD Application Connection Licenses that are applied to the 3300.
Mitel sent us 52 IP User licenses and 9 MCD ACLs and they all show as 61 IP Users in "License & Option Selection form" on 3300.
We already provisioned our 52 IP phones taking up the first 52 IP user licenses but if we try to create a new IP phone for NP VM ports, the system says that we already reached our limit of IP user licenses.
Are those MCD ACLs useful for something in a MCD<->NP integration? I saw on a previous thread someone asking a similar question and someone answered that it could be used for VM ports... but how?
Latest MAS release + MCD 5.0.
It's our first MAS/NP installation but we installed successfully many other standalone NPs before. The traditional way to setup NP VM ports on 3300 was to take IP User licenses for each port as 5020/5240 IP set.
Per example, if we had 9 NP VM ports and 52 users, we would have 61 IP User licenses on AMC and 61 IP User licenses in "License & Option Selection form" on 3300.
However, with the MAS, we have those MCD Application Connection Licenses that are applied to the 3300.
Mitel sent us 52 IP User licenses and 9 MCD ACLs and they all show as 61 IP Users in "License & Option Selection form" on 3300.
We already provisioned our 52 IP phones taking up the first 52 IP user licenses but if we try to create a new IP phone for NP VM ports, the system says that we already reached our limit of IP user licenses.
Are those MCD ACLs useful for something in a MCD<->NP integration? I saw on a previous thread someone asking a similar question and someone answered that it could be used for VM ports... but how?