I was wondering if any of the guru's out there could help clarify something about Macola and PSQL in my current setup. Our current setup has network shared files mapped to a drive letter from a Macola File Server/PSQL server. To start Macola the user launches Macola32.exe from the mapped network drive which initiates the Macola client. The client quickly flashes a PSQL logo then opens the Macola screen.
The strange thing is that on our live server the PSQL Server lists two databases: demodata and macola, however on my working backup server that I just created there is only one database: demodata. On the backup server I restored all the files from the macola75 directory, and all the data in the live version appears to be available.
This tends to lead me to believe that we are not actually using a SQL Database, but somehow handling database calls in a SQL format to flat files on the server. Is this how it's supposed to be? Is there someway that I can convert the data into the SQL Server's database engine and get rid of the flat files? It also seems that each client is accessing the files directly to get thier data, which I would rather have clients go through the SQL Server to get their data. If anyone can give me some tips on how to accomplish this I would appreciate it! Please let me know that you think!
Thanks,
Jodi Wurts
The strange thing is that on our live server the PSQL Server lists two databases: demodata and macola, however on my working backup server that I just created there is only one database: demodata. On the backup server I restored all the files from the macola75 directory, and all the data in the live version appears to be available.
This tends to lead me to believe that we are not actually using a SQL Database, but somehow handling database calls in a SQL format to flat files on the server. Is this how it's supposed to be? Is there someway that I can convert the data into the SQL Server's database engine and get rid of the flat files? It also seems that each client is accessing the files directly to get thier data, which I would rather have clients go through the SQL Server to get their data. If anyone can give me some tips on how to accomplish this I would appreciate it! Please let me know that you think!
Thanks,
Jodi Wurts