We recently switched over our corporate site from analog to a digital voice T1 (not PRI).
We have a 2nd T1 that is being used to provide Frame data to our remote location, along with 4 tie-lines.
The remote location is a warehouse running MICS 6.1 (G10). Corporate is running on MICS 5.0.
Prior to switching to the digital T1, all calls from the warehouse went through their own copper lines. We took one of the lines & put it in its own line pool, which was linked to a 6-digit destination code, that we would give to truck drivers, for them to place calls. We do not want temps, etc using the phone.
POTS was pool A
E&M between facilities was pool B
Foyer phone was pool F.
Anyways, we wanted to have as much outbound traffic flow through the T1. So, I set up a new schedule that would take the "9" access code & go through pool B, with an overflow to pool A.
This is working fine. We want to disconnect 2 of the 4 copper lines at the warehouse, since we no longer see the need for them.
Here is the problem...
We do not want to keep a seperate copper line just for the truckers. And, we do not want to dedicate one of the E&M channels (we only have 4) to use a COS associated with DISA.
I want to be able to dial an access code to gain access to a line pool (pool B), but do not want to allow the "9" access code (which is linked to the pool) to be used from this set.
I tried set restrictions, where I created a filter that would prohibit "9" from being dialed. I was hopeful that I could associate the "9" with a route, via the DialOut parameter. However, the set restriction does not allow the access code to work.
I have worked with my vendor on this, and he is unsure how to accomplish it.
Hopefully you can make some sense of what I am trying to accomplish.
Thanks
We have a 2nd T1 that is being used to provide Frame data to our remote location, along with 4 tie-lines.
The remote location is a warehouse running MICS 6.1 (G10). Corporate is running on MICS 5.0.
Prior to switching to the digital T1, all calls from the warehouse went through their own copper lines. We took one of the lines & put it in its own line pool, which was linked to a 6-digit destination code, that we would give to truck drivers, for them to place calls. We do not want temps, etc using the phone.
POTS was pool A
E&M between facilities was pool B
Foyer phone was pool F.
Anyways, we wanted to have as much outbound traffic flow through the T1. So, I set up a new schedule that would take the "9" access code & go through pool B, with an overflow to pool A.
This is working fine. We want to disconnect 2 of the 4 copper lines at the warehouse, since we no longer see the need for them.
Here is the problem...
We do not want to keep a seperate copper line just for the truckers. And, we do not want to dedicate one of the E&M channels (we only have 4) to use a COS associated with DISA.
I want to be able to dial an access code to gain access to a line pool (pool B), but do not want to allow the "9" access code (which is linked to the pool) to be used from this set.
I tried set restrictions, where I created a filter that would prohibit "9" from being dialed. I was hopeful that I could associate the "9" with a route, via the DialOut parameter. However, the set restriction does not allow the access code to work.
I have worked with my vendor on this, and he is unsure how to accomplish it.
Hopefully you can make some sense of what I am trying to accomplish.
Thanks