No if by active/active you mean both servers share the workload.
While hardware vendors often let customers in the belief that the second cluster node will be active, 95% of cluster implementations today are NOT active/active. While the second cluster node will do some tasks, he is not actively involved in the first node’s primary task such as for example operating a database.
I have work on a active/active implementation using GPFS and Oracle Grid, but even that was a bit unstable. Saying that it was a year ago and some of the bugs may had been ironed out now.
Mike
"A foolproof method for sculpting an elephant: first, get a huge block of marble, then you chip away everything that doesn't look like an elephant."
mrn has the right idea. My team is building an erp solution and we are not using hacmp. Oracle RAC all the way. It's scalable, and has fault tolerance built in.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.