disturbedone
Vendor
I have an issue where 2 GPOs with the same, differing, setting appears to cause a conflict. To simplfiy the scenario imagine these are the only 2 GPOs. They are used to deny access to logon to UserA & UserB. Certain OUs require UserA to be denied, certain OUs require UserB to be denied and certain OUs require both to be denied. Here's the settings...
GPO1\Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Polices\User Rights Assigment\Deny access to this computer from the network (Setting = DOMAIN\UserA
GPO2\Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Polices\User Rights Assigment\Deny access to this computer from the network (Setting = DOMAIN\UserB
OU1 requires both users be denied and has GPO1 with Link Order 1 and GPO2 with Link Order 2. This denies UserA from logging on but UserB is still allowed to logon. Reversing the Link Order changes which can logon. Between tests I run gpupdate to refresh the policy.
One option would be to create GPO3, add both users to this GPO and apply it to an OU that requires both users be denied. Then only apply GPO1/GPO2 to OUs that only require one being denied. But that's only if that's the only solution. I thought that GPOs with differing settings combined to give a "total" effective setting that would be applied.
Thoughts??
GPO1\Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Polices\User Rights Assigment\Deny access to this computer from the network (Setting = DOMAIN\UserA
GPO2\Computer Configuration\Windows Settings\Security Settings\Local Polices\User Rights Assigment\Deny access to this computer from the network (Setting = DOMAIN\UserB
OU1 requires both users be denied and has GPO1 with Link Order 1 and GPO2 with Link Order 2. This denies UserA from logging on but UserB is still allowed to logon. Reversing the Link Order changes which can logon. Between tests I run gpupdate to refresh the policy.
One option would be to create GPO3, add both users to this GPO and apply it to an OU that requires both users be denied. Then only apply GPO1/GPO2 to OUs that only require one being denied. But that's only if that's the only solution. I thought that GPOs with differing settings combined to give a "total" effective setting that would be applied.
Thoughts??