Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

FrameRelay Map-Class and CIR

Status
Not open for further replies.

CiscoFun

Technical User
Oct 18, 2001
14
US
Hello all,

Site A has a Frame-Relay Connection to Site C at 64KB and 32K CIR.
Site B has a Frame-Relay Connection to Site C at 64KB and a 16K CIR
Site A has a Fast-Ethernet Connection to Site B.

I have EIGRP turned on using AS number 1024.

I seem to be having trouble understanding what I should but under the map-class statements for these sites. I have the following:

Site A:
map-class frame-relay 32k
no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
frame-relay cir 32000
frame-relay bc 64000

Site B:
map-class frame-relay 16k
no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
frame-relay cir 16000
frame-relay bc 64000

The other issue I have is that EIGRP always sees the Fast-Ethernet as the best route to the destination. (Even on sites with equal CIR).

Thank you for any help.


 
EIGRP is calculating fastethernet port ( 10/100 MBPS) as the best path.

That is why it is not using the frame relay connection but the lan connection.

Regards
Raj
 
Yes I knew that :) but thank you very much. I am wondering how to fix this. I have played with variance but it seems to effect all my eigrp routes.

Thank you for you help.
 
The ether will always show up faster...unless you use the bandwidth command. On the fe, type "bandwidth..." something less then 32000. This will not actually change the bandwidth of the port, but the metric that eigrp uses to calculate the route.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top