Guest_imported
New member
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Hi,
i am a student preparing a FR overview for my colleagues and i have crawled the web to find dozens of white papers and for-dummies-tutorials just to end up with lots of questions, of which i want to address one right now, namly the addressing scheme of FR.
From what i've read, a DLCI has local significance only and is used in conjunction with a routing table filled with IP-Subnets. So, i assume that i tell the FR router to pass packets with the destination subnet address e.g. 9.0.0.0 on to the local DLCI, let's say, 50. Ok, data packets will be leaving my router on DLCI 50 and will arrive at the next FR switch. (BTW: I read that FR switches have routing tables, is this true? I thought only routers could have them..) Anyway, what happens at this router/switch then? My assumption is that the router unpacks the FR packet, looks at Layer 3 information (IP-Destination-address), looks up its own information of how to get to the IP-destination-subnet and will send the packet out on a port where this subnet can be reached at. Well, the problem is, if this is right, why is it called a "permanent" virtual channel and not a "I will find a way" channel. Many texts say that the path is known prior to sending the packet out and this is contradictory to finding a way on-the-fly. So may it be that there is a global address for an FR-router? One text stated that a DLCI has global significance since 1990 when Cisco et al. changed the existing FR standard, has this something to do with this?
Any cleaning up of my confused thoughts are very welcome. I guess the more i dig the internet the less i understand
Many greetings!
Bartman
i am a student preparing a FR overview for my colleagues and i have crawled the web to find dozens of white papers and for-dummies-tutorials just to end up with lots of questions, of which i want to address one right now, namly the addressing scheme of FR.
From what i've read, a DLCI has local significance only and is used in conjunction with a routing table filled with IP-Subnets. So, i assume that i tell the FR router to pass packets with the destination subnet address e.g. 9.0.0.0 on to the local DLCI, let's say, 50. Ok, data packets will be leaving my router on DLCI 50 and will arrive at the next FR switch. (BTW: I read that FR switches have routing tables, is this true? I thought only routers could have them..) Anyway, what happens at this router/switch then? My assumption is that the router unpacks the FR packet, looks at Layer 3 information (IP-Destination-address), looks up its own information of how to get to the IP-destination-subnet and will send the packet out on a port where this subnet can be reached at. Well, the problem is, if this is right, why is it called a "permanent" virtual channel and not a "I will find a way" channel. Many texts say that the path is known prior to sending the packet out and this is contradictory to finding a way on-the-fly. So may it be that there is a global address for an FR-router? One text stated that a DLCI has global significance since 1990 when Cisco et al. changed the existing FR standard, has this something to do with this?
Any cleaning up of my confused thoughts are very welcome. I guess the more i dig the internet the less i understand
Many greetings!
Bartman