What about links that are in <select> boxes? You know what I mean--drop down lists powered with JS. Those are also excluded? So the alternative would be to use the <select> box (or in nippi's case the menu) followed by a <noscript>?:
<noscript>
<a href="1.html">1</a>
<a href="2.html">2</a>
<a href="3.html">3</a>
<a href="4.html">4</a>
<a href="5.html">5</a>
</noscript>
I thought that whenever a search engine saw a "
While search engines, as Wullie points out, will not read a .js file, .js files do have an up side. They do reduce the number of lines of code that a search engine has to parse and ignore before it gets to your content. Do a search on ".js search engines" in any of the major search sites and you will get ample examples of what I'm talking about.
it just won't follow one in a .js file. It won't even see the <noscript> if it's put in the .js file. The search engine will never see the .js file, so my recommendation would be to add a <noscript> at the end of the webpage containing all of the links. That way, the search engine sees the content first, but it still follows the links.
Rick -----------------------------------------------------------
Changing that should not result in your sites getting unlisted. Your ranking will be lower if you have fewer links to your pages, but you will still be listed. Also, you have 3 links where there is no drop-down. Those pages would still be listed. My opinion is that Google somehow missed your site in its most recent scan.
The way to fix the links so they still get followed is to add this to the bottom of your webpages:
<noscript>
<a href="link1.html">link1</a>
<a href="link2.html">link2</a>
<a href="link3.html">link3</a>
<a href="link4.html">link4</a>
etc.
</noscript>
Rick -----------------------------------------------------------
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.