phoneman429
Vendor
Has anybody extended an ASU or ASUII over fiber? Any issue if so?
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Extended ASU/ASUII
- Thread starter phoneman429
- Start date
- Status
The Engineering Guide limits the distance for ASU's to 30m
Can you extend beyond this, maybe, but you're on your own support wise.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
Can you extend beyond this, maybe, but you're on your own support wise.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
- Thread starter
- #4
phoneman429
Vendor
I'm looking for an out of box solution, we need to get to an out building without replacing the 200 ICP w/ a 3300 for SIP gateways.
On a 200/3300 you can put a peripheral node over fiber up to 14K away.
More expensive than an ASU, but supported.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
More expensive than an ASU, but supported.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
- Thread starter
- #6
phoneman429
Vendor
Were replacing spines with IP sets and need 8 ONS ports in (2) buildings. the per cabinets are pushing this beyond the price of a 3300, the 3300 pushes the job out to RFP for anything.
Assuming these are for faxes and modems you are probably hooped.
If used for Voice only, there might be other options.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
If used for Voice only, there might be other options.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
actually they do! T38 over SIP trunks to Gateway was put in R9.
That was one of the key drivers for the T38 implementation.
There is many many to get analogue at remote sites.
If your not happy with sip trunks direct from the mitel to the gateway at remote site, then use a pair of gateways. One at head end and one at the remote end. It's called Satalite Office. Mitel has loads of info in there help files about it.
Always a solution ;
)
That was one of the key drivers for the T38 implementation.
There is many many to get analogue at remote sites.
If your not happy with sip trunks direct from the mitel to the gateway at remote site, then use a pair of gateways. One at head end and one at the remote end. It's called Satalite Office. Mitel has loads of info in there help files about it.
Always a solution ;
)Sorry Matt, we're speaking about the SX200 here. The customer is trying to avoid a 3300 upgrade.
T38 via SIP on a 200 is not supported to my knowledge.
Good try though.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
T38 via SIP on a 200 is not supported to my knowledge.
Good try though.
*******************************************************
Occam's Razor - All things being equal, the simplest solution is the right one.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question