Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Exchange 5.5 to 2000 multisite migration questions

Status
Not open for further replies.

FrankTrib

MIS
Jan 8, 2002
23
US

I'm working on a team to develop the plan and new Ex2k infrastructure for our Enterprise and I have a couple of feasibility questions.

Our Exchange 5.5 environment stretches coast-to-coast, but is all connected via reliable/high-speed links. It seems that the most robust, tolerant configuration would be a pure mesh with a single Admin Group / Routing Group and SMTP connectors at geographically dispersed locations, but what am I missing? The organization is comprised of several divisions or companies that are part of the top level company (where I do my voodoo). The only downside (THAT I SEE) is what-if.... a MAPI worm virus actually does make it to a users desktop and get opened? We no longer have bridgehead servers and connectors that we can stop to quarantine the spread of the worm. Another possible topology we're considering to combat that threat is two Routing Groups: one with only SMTP connectors and the other with all other Exchange servers. Sure, we could stay with the current Hub and Spoke configuration that we have now, but where is the adventure in that?

Any insights greatly appreciated.

Frank Hardwick
 
Admin Groups are for just that. Administration.

You can still have one MX record and have that be your "bridgehead". AD Replication should be your concern in my opinion. Dan
Microsoft Exchange Support @ Microsoft
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top