I'm working on aproject plan that will feed back into some capatilized hours so although I'm a techie I had to add 2 fields.
Since the techs will only be spending half (50%) of each day that they work on the project (as I indicated in resources) that doubles the "Duration". For example, for a task that I had initially set to last 1 day now says it will take 2 days. PERFECT!
The problem comes when I added a column for "Work". I added this so that I could show that although the Duration of the project (and all of it's individual tasks) would take 4 months, that this particular tech would only be spending half of the Duration indicate actually working on it.
It now shows what I expected it to show on the "tasks" which is to indicate that this task will take 1 days' worth of actual "work" EXCEPT for the roll-up which stills shows the same number of hours as the duration does.
I'm no master at Project so I'll go ahead and explain what I mean by roll-up. My team has to roll-out 30 new servers starting in February.
I started with a task at the top that says
2005 Server Roll-Out
Under that I have
Server1
which is indented so that it will roll-up if I wanted to only show the top line.
Under that I have all of the tasks that have to be completed to roll-out server1 which of course are indented so that if I wanted to just show the servers with their timelines instead of all of the tasks (you know, like if I was showing it to management).
Is it the way I'm doing it or what? I just don't see how Duration and work could come oput to the same number of hours when all of the sub-tasks undere work are half of what all the tasks are under duration...
Thanks,
-Prod
Since the techs will only be spending half (50%) of each day that they work on the project (as I indicated in resources) that doubles the "Duration". For example, for a task that I had initially set to last 1 day now says it will take 2 days. PERFECT!
The problem comes when I added a column for "Work". I added this so that I could show that although the Duration of the project (and all of it's individual tasks) would take 4 months, that this particular tech would only be spending half of the Duration indicate actually working on it.
It now shows what I expected it to show on the "tasks" which is to indicate that this task will take 1 days' worth of actual "work" EXCEPT for the roll-up which stills shows the same number of hours as the duration does.
I'm no master at Project so I'll go ahead and explain what I mean by roll-up. My team has to roll-out 30 new servers starting in February.
I started with a task at the top that says
2005 Server Roll-Out
Under that I have
Server1
which is indented so that it will roll-up if I wanted to only show the top line.
Under that I have all of the tasks that have to be completed to roll-out server1 which of course are indented so that if I wanted to just show the servers with their timelines instead of all of the tasks (you know, like if I was showing it to management).
Is it the way I'm doing it or what? I just don't see how Duration and work could come oput to the same number of hours when all of the sub-tasks undere work are half of what all the tasks are under duration...
Thanks,
-Prod