I have been using an old Matrox G400 Dualhead card for some time, but have just bought a new PC with XP, which is not for games, so no fancy graphics are needed but I do need to run at 1600 x 1200. I was going to put the Matrox in it, but it is for a card slot format that my new PC does not have.
However, a new G450 is only £60 so no problem to replace, but I was thinking about using 3 monitors, not just 2.
The obvious two choices are:
1. To use a triple head card, such as the Matrox P750, but not only is this more like £145, but it says it only does triple head on analog monitors, which is no good, and how does it do 3 monitors when the pictures only show 2 outputs like a dual head?
2. Get a dual head and a normal card and use XPs multi-monitor support. What I don't know is whether this will actually give me the same effect, or if there are some oddities.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.
However, a new G450 is only £60 so no problem to replace, but I was thinking about using 3 monitors, not just 2.
The obvious two choices are:
1. To use a triple head card, such as the Matrox P750, but not only is this more like £145, but it says it only does triple head on analog monitors, which is no good, and how does it do 3 monitors when the pictures only show 2 outputs like a dual head?
2. Get a dual head and a normal card and use XPs multi-monitor support. What I don't know is whether this will actually give me the same effect, or if there are some oddities.
Any thoughts?
Thanks.