Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chris Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Drive config pros and cons

Status
Not open for further replies.

ABOzIT

IS-IT--Management
May 1, 2003
226
JP
I am about to reconfigure my PE2550 with some larger hard drives. I was going to put in 3 X 73Gb drives and configure them as one RAID 5 container giving me 146GB then create 2 volumes, one for the OS and the other for my application data. Then I had an idea to use one of the smaller drives I was taking out as one container for the OS and use the 3 new drives as another container for my applications.

Besides having no redundancy for my OS can anyone think of any other pros and cons from this config. I want to make sure I'm covering all bases before I proceed.

Thanks!
 
Don't do it unless you have 2 smaller drives and can RAID1 mirror them for the OS. The loss of redundancy in itself is reason enough not to do it, assuming it's a production server.
 
On raid adapters I have tried raid 1 for the OS and raid 5 for the data. I find it noticeably slower, raid 1 drives thrash a great deal, and are consistantly warmer. Raid adapters are not optimized for raid 1.

My general setups consist of a raid 5 volume with two partitions, one for the OS and one for data. Fairly safe, I have had corruption on the OS partition, and purposely destroyed OS partitons, every time the data partition remains intact.
 
Thanks for your input guys! Makes good sense.

Cheers!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top