springle
IS-IT--Management
- Jan 7, 2005
- 7
Greetings to all,
I am having a very tough time designing a report involving 3 tables from out CRM system, Goldmine, and I think I just need a push in the right direction.
What I am trying to accomplish is to show all activities both schedule (CAL table) and completed (HIST table) by a user in a given time period. The report would be somthing like select a date range, select a user, and then display details and count of all activities, pending and completed. I would like to have one line per acitivity.
The problem is that scheduled and completed activities are in separate tables and each linked to the main contact talbe via a one (contact) to many (activity) link by an account number.
At first I was thinking that a sub report would be the answer but I have not been able to make that work.
Then I though what if I merged the CAL and HIST tables into one. Then the report would be simple. If that is feasable then it might be able to succeed since design of the CAL and HIST tables are VERY similar and both share the same linking field, accountno.
Thanks in advance for you help,
Scott
I am having a very tough time designing a report involving 3 tables from out CRM system, Goldmine, and I think I just need a push in the right direction.
What I am trying to accomplish is to show all activities both schedule (CAL table) and completed (HIST table) by a user in a given time period. The report would be somthing like select a date range, select a user, and then display details and count of all activities, pending and completed. I would like to have one line per acitivity.
The problem is that scheduled and completed activities are in separate tables and each linked to the main contact talbe via a one (contact) to many (activity) link by an account number.
At first I was thinking that a sub report would be the answer but I have not been able to make that work.
Then I though what if I merged the CAL and HIST tables into one. Then the report would be simple. If that is feasable then it might be able to succeed since design of the CAL and HIST tables are VERY similar and both share the same linking field, accountno.
Thanks in advance for you help,
Scott