Delphi XE2 and SPNEGO

[Nordlund]

Im trying to authenticate to a secured webserver which is using SPNEGO.
Does anyone know about code examples components (winsock or Indy addon components) that could help me negotiate with the server?

Im currently use Delphi XE2 and Indy 10 but its there exist other Winsock components that are able to negotiage using SPNEGO just throw a message.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPNEGO

[tt]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do not underestimate the power of [!]Google[/!][/tt]

 

[majlumbo]

I don't have any specifics, but a good place to start would be the JEDI Windows Security Library. You can access it here.

 

[Nordlund]

After using Google I found out SPNEGO is the serverside implementation. Im supposed to use Integrated Windows logon using negotiation using Kerberos. (SSPI in this case)
I also found out that Indy have some problems with this and it will not work....

I dont know if this is the truth or not....




[tt]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do not underestimate the power of [!]Google[/!][/tt]

 

[Nordlund]

Fyi:

http://indy.codeplex.com/workitem/23498

http://indy.codeplex.com/workitem/23498

[tt]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do not underestimate the power of [!]Google[/!][/tt]

 

[Nordlund]

https://code.google.com/p/indyproject/issues/detail?id=236

[tt]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do not underestimate the power of [!]Google[/!][/tt]

 

[whosrdaddy]

Maybe check with Remy Lebeau on SO himself, it seems he created the workitem

/Daddy

-----------------------------------------------------
Helping people is my job...

 

[Nordlund]

I did speak to him about this issue, but i didnt get the answer I was hoping for.
I think I have to search for another way to solve it.

Not nativly, no. One would have to read the relevant RFC(s) and then fix
the broken logic in IdAuthenticationSSPI.pas itself. I haven't had any time
to do that myself yet.

--
Remy Lebeau (TeamB)

https://forums.embarcadero.com/thread.jspa?threadID=91097

[tt]~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do not underestimate the power of [!]Google[/!][/tt]