Greetings all !
I have just cloned a Toshiba Tecra laptop
running SCO Open Server 4.0.5 (and Win 95)
using the DD command in a Linux forensics distribution.
NB ! we have SCO licenses for two (and more)
machines but chose to clone since the SCO/Win95
coniguration & tools are very special and complex to
install from scratch.
The two laptops were the exact same
model, same harddisks, network card etc
and the cloning was successful.
SCO runs fine and so does Win95.
This laptop is special as it is used to
run different tasks on ticket vending machines.
We then tested both laptops on a routine
job in a ticket vending machine and the original
machine did the task as it should (installation
of the ticketing machine), but the
cloned machine failed.
I have had a look through both machines
and have found the following differences :
The cloned machine has a defect CD rom
and the battery lamp is yellow.
This is also reflected during boot
as the CD rom is not mounted on the cloned machine.
(CD ROM is not used for the task against
the ticketing machine)
I also checked Process Manager and the
original machine has 46 procs while
the cloned machine has 42.
The missing processes on the cloned machine were :
initd
routed
snmpd
strerr
Also the PID's are different on the two
machines but this should be no problem.
During the task we tested with the laptop
connected to the ticketing machine.
The ticketing machine is booted via a floppy
while SCO is running,
the ticketing machine SW then should
fetch data from the SCO laptop but this seemed to fail.
So a missing service might be the cause.
Thw network lamp is green and SCO does
not give any network error during boot,
I did also try to swap network cards.
If anyone have any comments on the missing Procs
on the cloned machine or any tips on where
to check & compare the two laptops this would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks alot !
kind regards,
M~
I have just cloned a Toshiba Tecra laptop
running SCO Open Server 4.0.5 (and Win 95)
using the DD command in a Linux forensics distribution.
NB ! we have SCO licenses for two (and more)
machines but chose to clone since the SCO/Win95
coniguration & tools are very special and complex to
install from scratch.
The two laptops were the exact same
model, same harddisks, network card etc
and the cloning was successful.
SCO runs fine and so does Win95.
This laptop is special as it is used to
run different tasks on ticket vending machines.
We then tested both laptops on a routine
job in a ticket vending machine and the original
machine did the task as it should (installation
of the ticketing machine), but the
cloned machine failed.
I have had a look through both machines
and have found the following differences :
The cloned machine has a defect CD rom
and the battery lamp is yellow.
This is also reflected during boot
as the CD rom is not mounted on the cloned machine.
(CD ROM is not used for the task against
the ticketing machine)
I also checked Process Manager and the
original machine has 46 procs while
the cloned machine has 42.
The missing processes on the cloned machine were :
initd
routed
snmpd
strerr
Also the PID's are different on the two
machines but this should be no problem.
During the task we tested with the laptop
connected to the ticketing machine.
The ticketing machine is booted via a floppy
while SCO is running,
the ticketing machine SW then should
fetch data from the SCO laptop but this seemed to fail.
So a missing service might be the cause.
Thw network lamp is green and SCO does
not give any network error during boot,
I did also try to swap network cards.
If anyone have any comments on the missing Procs
on the cloned machine or any tips on where
to check & compare the two laptops this would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks alot !
kind regards,
M~