Some developers in house are using VFP, and some FPW 2.6, and still one using FPDOS 2.5, all writing tables for use with a FPDOS2.5 app.
So, a simple question, one which has probably been answered before:
I want to create a table in VFP, and have FPDOS/FPW able to use the table (so no autoincrementing fields etc).
My proposed 'solution' right now is to hack the dbf file... converting the 0x30 (VFP) file type byte to 0x03(no memos) or 0x83(with memos), stripping the 263 bytes of the 'database container', and re-setting the data pointer.
1) Did I miss something spectacularly simple ?
2) Is this 'solution' workable ?
3) Has anybody tried it on their own systems ?
So, a simple question, one which has probably been answered before:
I want to create a table in VFP, and have FPDOS/FPW able to use the table (so no autoincrementing fields etc).
My proposed 'solution' right now is to hack the dbf file... converting the 0x30 (VFP) file type byte to 0x03(no memos) or 0x83(with memos), stripping the 263 bytes of the 'database container', and re-setting the data pointer.
1) Did I miss something spectacularly simple ?
2) Is this 'solution' workable ?
3) Has anybody tried it on their own systems ?