Have a 333MHz 160Mb iMac at home on which I ran 10.1 (not Jaguar). The poor speed was reason enough to send me back to 9.2.2. I also couldn't get drivers for a couple of my peripherals.
Eventually I will go to 10.2, but only when I upgrade. Thanks to the fab spec of the new powerbooks, that may be sooner than I was expecting!
lex
I have a G3400 imac dv se. I am running Jaguar 10.2.2 and I do not have any problems with it at all. I do notice a speed difference when I boot os 9.2, but speed for features is the big tradeoff here. It is not bad though! Still very workable.
I run 10.1.5 on a 350MHz iMac with 320 Mb RAM. There seems to be no problem.
If you find yourself often waiting for things to process on your current system, you may wait a smidgen longer if you upgrade to a higher OS (no matter what platform).
SOunds lke you are asking about a tower when you say "G3 400" though I'm assuming...then all the above folks respond with iMac info. Weird.
I'm running a 400Mhz b/w yosemite at the house with 10.1 and 384MB or X-compliant RAM.
I find it quite nice on the speed front. No real issues unless I'm running something like GoLive in Classic and then I get some image draw issues. I pretty much stay OUT of Classic. Run photoshop etc on the X side with no trouble.
Just a comment, those folks with near 128 Meg of RAM seemed unhappy, folks with same CPU speeds but over 256 meg of RAM seem happy, this may well be significant. I tried to remain child-like, all I acheived was childish.
I ran OSX 10.2.3 on a blue & white G3/300. I have 384megs of ram though. It ran well. I recently bought a g4/500 upgrade from sonnet. It runs even better
PT
Add more Memmory - It will help a lot.
I have 384mg ram on a Rev B G3 Imac and it ran acceptable.
I have since upgraded it to a 600Mhz G3 and it runs very nice - I'll never use OS 9 again!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.