Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Connecting remote sites 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

andyds

IS-IT--Management
Feb 22, 2007
91
GB
Server = Windows 2003 – Clients = XP

This may not be the correct forum for this query but I have a Windows 2003 server acting as a domain controller to the PC’s in our main office. I have four remote office’s that now need to be connected (securely) into the main office so they will managed centrally by the domain controller.

I need some advice on the best way to go about this. The remote sites only have about 20 users each and all have internet access. I have to work with a modest budget and this needs to be taken into consideration. What options have I got?

Any help appreciated.
 
I would suggest a site to site VPN (probably using a Cisco PIX firewall). You can get low end firewalls in the market. This is the secured way of interconnecting branch offices.

-Keshav
 
Would I have to purchase one for each site? How would it work?
 
You would have to purchase one for each site. Check for different Cisco PIX firewall security appliances before you decide on a specific model. I believe Cisco PIX 501 should meet your requirements. More details can be found at:


How it works:

Install the PIX devices one in each site. Configure site to site VPN between them. Each site would become a subnet. For example:

Site A (Head Office) - 192.168.10.0
Site B (Branch Office) - 192.168.11.0
Site C (Branch Office) - 192.168.12.0

Regarding the Active Directory design part, I would recommend a domain controller placement in a site with more than 10-15 users. Each office would become a "Site" in Active Directory. After you have configured "Sites" in Active Directory, you could configure replication between the sites.

Hope this helps. Post back if you have more questions.

-Keshav
 
Only thing that I would change about this recommendation is to go with Cisco ASA instead of PIX. You get a lot more functionality for roughly the same price. The ASA that is comparable to the PIX 501 is the ASA 5505.

There are other SOHO firewall options that might be a tad less expensive than the ASA or PIX, but for a cost savings of $40-$50 per unit you're losing a lot of functionality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top