Tommojunior
MIS
Hi All,
We are running NB4.5-FP6. Our catalog size is approaching 25Gb (and growing organically). We've made some gains in reducing the catalog size by reviewing our policy setups and retention periods but the size is making the creation of the catalog tapes a little painful.
At this time I don't want to restrict the scope of data going to the catalog tape, because any of it could be of use in a DR situation.
Our catalog is already in the default binary format and we have automatic catalog compression set to 21 days.
My question is on the impact (if any) of reducing this time down to say 3 days. Can anyone confirm if:
1) Will there will be any impact to our operator's attempts to perform restores. Is it just a case of master server overhead as NetBackup uncompresses pieces of the database or does it actually stop any restore attempts?
2) We can expect to get a significant reduction in the catalogue size (likely compression ratio?)
3) Is the size of the catalog directly proportional to the time taken to create the catalog tape? and also proportional to the speed of catalog restore in a DR situation.
4) Any other knock-on effects?
All help/guidence/comments most welcome!
Mark
We are running NB4.5-FP6. Our catalog size is approaching 25Gb (and growing organically). We've made some gains in reducing the catalog size by reviewing our policy setups and retention periods but the size is making the creation of the catalog tapes a little painful.
At this time I don't want to restrict the scope of data going to the catalog tape, because any of it could be of use in a DR situation.
Our catalog is already in the default binary format and we have automatic catalog compression set to 21 days.
My question is on the impact (if any) of reducing this time down to say 3 days. Can anyone confirm if:
1) Will there will be any impact to our operator's attempts to perform restores. Is it just a case of master server overhead as NetBackup uncompresses pieces of the database or does it actually stop any restore attempts?
2) We can expect to get a significant reduction in the catalogue size (likely compression ratio?)
3) Is the size of the catalog directly proportional to the time taken to create the catalog tape? and also proportional to the speed of catalog restore in a DR situation.
4) Any other knock-on effects?
All help/guidence/comments most welcome!
Mark