Complicated routing + restriction issue SV9500

[phadobas]

I have 3 phone systems, and they are all IP CCIS-d together. They are SV9500. They are system A, B and C.

What I'm trying to achieve is this:

On system A, if somebody wants to call System B ext 1234, they dial 81+1234
On system A, if somebody wants to call System C ext 1234, they dial 82+1234

This is working just fine. Since this is IP CCIS point-to-mulitpoint, the call from System A leaves on route 10 (for example) no matter whether you are calling system B or C.

But now I want my users to not be able to call system C ext 1234. I want it restricted.

On system A, I have AFRS for DC=81 OPR=81. And in AOPR=81, I send calls to RT10, PC=1 (for system B), stripping the first 2 digits.
On system A, I have AFRS for DC=82 OPR=82. And in AOPR=82, I send calls to RT10, PC=2 (for system C), stripping the first 2 digits.

I can't figure out, how to tell the system to block the call to RT=10 if it's destined to PC=3, and allow the call on RT=10 if it's destined to PC=2.

I had high hopes in ATDP, but I found that it only looks at the digits that are being sent, it doesn't take into consideration the leading 81 or 82.
Any thoughts?

 

[belevedere]

Is AFRS for 82 broken out? If so, try deleting 82+1234.

 

[phadobas]

No, AFRS only has 81 defined and 82 defined.
So if you dial 81+1234, AFRS says use OPR 81. OPR 81 says got IPCCIS route 10, with PC=1, stripping the first 2 digits.
And if you dial 82+1234, AFRS says use OPR 82. OPR 81 says got IPCCIS route 10, with PC=2, stripping the first 2 digits.

So at the end, only digits 1234 are being send down the line, to either PC=1 or PC=2.

 

[belevedere]

You need to brake out 82 so 82+1234 is not routed.
EX: 820 - opr x
822 - 829 - opr x
821230 - opr x
821234 - none
821235 - opr x etc.

 

[phadobas]

Thank you for the advice. I'm afraid I didn't put down all the information.

Basically on system A, I do need some people to be able to call 81+1234 and also 82+1234, while others shouldn't be able to call those numbers.

So now this could be done by using different RSC for the different users on system A and ATDPR.

However the problem is this:
RSC=1 on system A should be able to call any number on both systems B and C.
RSC=2 on system A should not be able call 81+1234 on system B, but should be able to call 82+1234 on system C.

So if try to use ATDP for this, based on RSC and route, I can't differentiate between systems B and C since the call from system A leaves on the same IPCCIS route.