Cisco Help Needed Newbie can not get two routers to communicate

[alphaNumerics123]

I dont know if any of you guys can help me out with this, but I am kind of stuck.

Equiptment:

Linksys RV082 dual wan router

Cisco 2821 integrated service router

What I am trying to do is connect the RV082 to the 2 ISP's I have coming into the building(for redundancy purposes) and on one of the eight switch ports on the RV082 I want to connect to the 2821 router. From the 2821 router I want to connect a standard switch with a computer on the other end. Currently I have been working on this and think i have gotten the outside interface of the 2821 to pass the test (the outside interface is interface 0/1. The inside interface is interface 0/0). The RV082 is currenly configured as a gateway and connected to both Comcast and Bellsouth/ATT. I have posted the 2821's router configuration below for review. The ip's are as follows:

Linksys RV082 192.168.0.1
Cisco 2821 (interface 0/0) 192.168.3.1
Cisco 2821 (interface 0/1) 192.168.0.100

Do I need more hardware to make this happen? Different configuration? Or does this just not work, if so what does?
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Router configuraton file:




Building configuration...

Current configuration : 1996 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname Cisco_Router
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
no logging buffered
enable secret 5 $1$bE/H$hMJte.pXZwXheicY6OCck.
enable password ***********
!
no aaa new-model
dot11 syslog
!
!
no ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.1 192.168.3.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.200 192.168.3.254
!
ip dhcp pool POOL
import all
network 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.3.1
lease infinite
!
!
!
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
archive
log config
hidekeys
!
!
!
!
zone security both
!
!
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
zone-member security both
ip route-cache flow
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
no mop enabled
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description $ETH-WAN$
ip address dhcp client-id GigabitEthernet0/1
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
zone-member security both
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
!
router rip
network 192.168.0.0
network 192.168.3.0
no auto-summary
!
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/0 permanent
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.1 permanent
!
!
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list 2 interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
!
access-list 1 remark INSIDE_IF=GigabitEthernet0/0
access-list 1 remark SDM_ACL Category=2
access-list 1 permit 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 remark SDM_ACL Category=2
access-list 2 permit 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
snmp-server community public RO
!
!
!
!
!
!
control-plane
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password ***********
login
!
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
no process cpu extended
no process cpu autoprofile hog
!
end

 

[unclerico]

what exactly is the problem that you're having??

I hate all Uppercase... I don't want my groups to seem angry at me all the time! =)
- ColdFlame (vbscript forum)

 

[burtsbees]

Are you NATting in the WAN router? If so, stop trying to NAT in the Cisco.

Are the WAN router switchports truly L2 switchports? If so, you would connect the routers with a straight-thru ethernet cable.

Get rid of this:
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.1 permanent

The fact that you stated that the IP address of gi0/1 is .100, that means that the routers are indeed communicating (the first address in a dhcp pool by default in those types of routers is .100).

I would also get rid of RIP, unless the WAN router supports it. It would need a route to 3.0 network...

Your main problem(s) are

1)NAT
2)Possibly no route in the WAN router for the LAN off of the 2800.

/

 

[alphaNumerics123]

Thank you for this exelent reply! It has helped alot, I only have one more question...what are the static routes that I should configure inside the linksys RV082 router?

 

[burtsbees]

ip route 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.100

That's what you would do if it were a Cisco...I am not sure of the command in the RV082. You want to tell it this:

"To get to the 192.168.3.0/24 subnet, we have to go to 192.168.0.100, which is my next hop. That hop (router) will know how to route the packets"

/