The 2620 is running 12.x of the IOS (sorry, can't telnet into it, don't recall the release), the PIX is running 6.x (PDM is too slow at 56k for me to post in this preliminary question).
I need help in a bad way.
In trying to keeps things simple (remember KISS?), I've been allocated 1 public IP address for one leg of a WAN (each leg setup the same, except other legs have smaller PIXes), so I've had to PAT with the PIX for the private network.
I've also had to statically NAT f0/0 in the 2600 to the public address of ser0/0, otherwise only one user at a time gets out.
Outbound internet access is fine, which I've been trying to achieve is an ipsec tunnel with another leg.
Sounded easy looking at the documentation and the other information I've run across........
Anywhoot, I can't get the outside ports on the PIXes to initiate a tunnel.
Is my ideology flawed or my implementation?
In theory, I can't see any reason why this shouldn't work (although I'm having a hard time understanding how the other outside interface is going to receive a datagram from it's peer because the source address has been altered).
H E L P ? ! ? ! ?