Hi,
I have a Catalyst 4006 which (i was told) is meant to be quite quick in the routing stakes.. my experience has been to the contrary.
With just a couple of simple static routes (100MB LAN Segment to 100MB LAN Segment) and my (3x) backup servers routing through it i am getting CPU utilisation well over %80 for the time period the backups are running. And if i run more host traffic through the switch i get noticable traffic delays.
Now i know that on a 4006 the CPU is expected to average around the %20 percent mark as it is monitoring switchport (5 x 48 ports) status, etherchannel etc... but i was suprised that it does not out perform a Cisco 2600 router! which does handle that traffic throughput easily.
can anyone else confirm this or is this perhaps more a mis-configuration issue.. which if so what kind of mis-configuration could cause this poor routing performance.
cheers
joel
I have a Catalyst 4006 which (i was told) is meant to be quite quick in the routing stakes.. my experience has been to the contrary.
With just a couple of simple static routes (100MB LAN Segment to 100MB LAN Segment) and my (3x) backup servers routing through it i am getting CPU utilisation well over %80 for the time period the backups are running. And if i run more host traffic through the switch i get noticable traffic delays.
Now i know that on a 4006 the CPU is expected to average around the %20 percent mark as it is monitoring switchport (5 x 48 ports) status, etherchannel etc... but i was suprised that it does not out perform a Cisco 2600 router! which does handle that traffic throughput easily.
can anyone else confirm this or is this perhaps more a mis-configuration issue.. which if so what kind of mis-configuration could cause this poor routing performance.
cheers
joel