Cannot Ping

[captnops]

I have two locations that are connected by a PTP T1. My side has a cisco 1720 and connects to my network via interface FA0. I am unable to ping the other network address of 10.120.1.1 across the serial0 interface.

I have attached my running config and any help would be greatly appreciated.

Current configuration : 1334 bytes
!
version 12.1
no service single-slot-reload-enable
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
!
hostname rtr1
!
logging buffered 4096 debugging
logging rate-limit console 10 except errors
no logging console
!
username XXXXXXXXXXXX
memory-size iomem 25
ip subnet-zero
no ip routing
no ip finger
!
!
interface BRI0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 10.10.10.135 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
speed auto
!
interface Serial0
ip address 10.2.2.2 255.255.255.252
ip access-group 101 in
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
service-module t1 timeslots 1-24
!
ip default-gateway 10.2.2.2
ip classless
ip route 10.120.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1
ip route 10.120.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.235
ip route 10.130.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1
ip route 192.168.168.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1
no ip http server
!
logging trap debugging
access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.49
access-list 1 deny any log
access-list 101 permit ip any any
access-list 101 permit tcp any any
access-list 101 permit udp any any
!
line con 0
login local
transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
access-class 1 in
login local
transport input telnet
!
end

 

[baye]

under global configs type "ip routing" then lets see

cheers.

 

[plshlpme]

does rtr2 have a static route back to this subnet assigned?

 

[captnops]

Baye---

no joy on running ip routing...just returns to prompt

plshlpme---

i do not have physical or remote access to that router. I have asked for running config, but no joy as yet.

 

[Fatty99]

ip route 10.120.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1
ip route 10.120.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.235 --> NOK
ip route 10.130.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1
ip route 192.168.168.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1

Reading your post, I assume
10.10.10.0/24 is your local network and 10.120.1.0/24 is your remote network.
In this case,the static route for 10.120.1.0/24 is pointing back to your locally connected network. This route should point to the farend ip adress of the PTP connection, 10.2.2.1.

btw the remote router also needs a route back for network 10.10.10.0/24.

grtz,

Fatty

 

[captnops]

Fatty99--

I am probably wrong, but would not that IP route be necessary for traffic to be allowed into my router from 10.120.1.0? I assume that there is a static router from 10.120.1.0 that points to the interface @ 10.2.2.1, but have been unable (as yet) to confirm.

Are you saying that this line;
ip route 10.120.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.235 --> NOK

should read;
ip route 10.2.2.1 --> x.x.x.x (interface at farend router)?

Thanks for the help.

 

[plshlpme]

hes right...

you need ip route 10.120.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.235
(this route tells your router to send anything destined for the 10.120.1 network to the host 10.10.10.235)

to be
ip route 10.120.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.1

and also at the remote router you need
ip route 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.2.2


also your default route of 10.2.2.2 is yourself... is that what you intended? or do you want all traffic to go to the remote site? which would be 10.2.2.1