On the other hand, having now delved into the Adobe forum where I suspect you use a different name, the answer may well be NO despite Adobe's advertising.
I called Adobe yesterday and after being up on hold for 5 minutes the lady came back and said that it did. But i didn't get a warm feeling that she was right.
I used older versions of Flix quite a lot with DV footage and was very pleased with the quality.
A CNET reviewer of your camera finished with "Like the HDR-SR1 before it, the Sony Handycam HDR-SR7 is an excellent HD camcorder that tries to deliver the promised convenience of hard-disk-based recording. But the lack of widespread software support remains an insurmountable inconvenience, holding me back from recommending it to all but the bravest of video geeks. "
I want to publish high quality training videos on the web with my new HD camcorder - I know I can't publish in HD on Flash (at least not yet) but I want the best quality, so do I film it in HD and then export it, or do I film it in SD for best results?
I spoke with Tim Carter over at AskTheBuilder.com what he is doing, and he is using two $3,000 HD cameras for just doing stuff on the internet.
Sounds like overkill but he seems to know what he is doing so I want to follow - but I don't have the money for a Canon XH-A1 so I went the cheaper route.
He publishes to YouTube where the quality is crappy and I want to publish my own 3 or 4 minute videos straight from my server for high quality without any streaming (because I can't afford it).
My relatively limited use of HD material (my colleague does the camera work - I just get the edited tapes after AVID for use on CD/DVD for advertising) suggests that you get better-looking results in the final format than starting with DV, so I hope you enjoy your new kit.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.