Hi
Can VFP9's report engine still use the old style .frx hacks for granular reporting. In a kiosk style of app, I need to NOT allow the user to select a printer, or copies and etc. I need to handle the printer selection, copies, duplex, color, collation, size, landscape/portrait settings all from the options table where only a user with admin rights can change.
Mike's article from kind of says yes, so before testing later, I thought I'd ask for a quick and definitive answer. I've also read many other articles that says the new vfp9 engine does not use those values anymore. Is this true?
My old vfp7 app is ignoring the hacked settings and prints where it wants on a Win7,8, and 10 machines. I have examined the .frx files and actually see the hacks being done, however printing is still unpredictable. The printers are network printers and using their crazy port numbers, so I changed them all to short names with actual ip addresses, and still unpredictable. I'm testing on a Win10p machine. What else should I be looking for?
Thanks,
Stanley
Can VFP9's report engine still use the old style .frx hacks for granular reporting. In a kiosk style of app, I need to NOT allow the user to select a printer, or copies and etc. I need to handle the printer selection, copies, duplex, color, collation, size, landscape/portrait settings all from the options table where only a user with admin rights can change.
Mike's article from kind of says yes, so before testing later, I thought I'd ask for a quick and definitive answer. I've also read many other articles that says the new vfp9 engine does not use those values anymore. Is this true?
My old vfp7 app is ignoring the hacked settings and prints where it wants on a Win7,8, and 10 machines. I have examined the .frx files and actually see the hacks being done, however printing is still unpredictable. The printers are network printers and using their crazy port numbers, so I changed them all to short names with actual ip addresses, and still unpredictable. I'm testing on a Win10p machine. What else should I be looking for?
Thanks,
Stanley