Ive read a couple of threads on this forum re IOS versions and stack membership.. and found out that really all stack members should have the same IOS incase of stack master failure, and I just wanted to clarify a few things...
For example... we have an 8 switch stack of 3750's, the top and bottm switches are configured to use their gigabit interfaces as uplinks back to the core, and are configured in such a way that if the top switch (master) fails, the bottom will handle the traffic...
So my quesiton is can these 2 switches alone have the IPservices IOS on, and the inbetween switches have the IPbase IOS of the same revision? As only these 2 are connected to the core, these are the most important, and the chances of both failing would hopefully be rather slim. Yhere seems little point in having all stack memebers with the IPServices IOS?
Any comments would be welcome... thanks
For example... we have an 8 switch stack of 3750's, the top and bottm switches are configured to use their gigabit interfaces as uplinks back to the core, and are configured in such a way that if the top switch (master) fails, the bottom will handle the traffic...
So my quesiton is can these 2 switches alone have the IPservices IOS on, and the inbetween switches have the IPbase IOS of the same revision? As only these 2 are connected to the core, these are the most important, and the chances of both failing would hopefully be rather slim. Yhere seems little point in having all stack memebers with the IPServices IOS?
Any comments would be welcome... thanks