At our company, we've been using the wiki pages to build things such as internal help files, glossaries, etc, and I just got to thinking:
Can this be done in more of a CMS style with SharePoint?
In other words, is there a way to build a content type that can be referenced in a "dictionary" format in this manner?
For instance, let's say we have a list of words with their definitions. The words are:
Apple, Orange, Box, Plank, Brick, Water, Morter, Hammer, Screw Driver
And for those, we want to have different methods of viewing them - say different filters.
So, if stored correctly, we could have the filters call them up so they will be listed like this:
-------------
Consumables:
Apple, Orange, Water
Food:
Apple, Orange
Wooden:
Box, Plank
Building Materials:
Plank, Brick, Water, Morter
Tools:
Hammer, Screw Driver
-------------
My first thought is that perhaps this could be done with a certain type of library. But I'm not really sure right away as to which way would be good for going with this.
At this point, this is more or less just a suggestion/discussion type item, not really something definitely being implemented.
Thanks for any thoughts/suggestions/references.
--
"If to err is human, then I must be some kind of human!" -Me
Can this be done in more of a CMS style with SharePoint?
In other words, is there a way to build a content type that can be referenced in a "dictionary" format in this manner?
For instance, let's say we have a list of words with their definitions. The words are:
Apple, Orange, Box, Plank, Brick, Water, Morter, Hammer, Screw Driver
And for those, we want to have different methods of viewing them - say different filters.
So, if stored correctly, we could have the filters call them up so they will be listed like this:
-------------
Consumables:
Apple, Orange, Water
Food:
Apple, Orange
Wooden:
Box, Plank
Building Materials:
Plank, Brick, Water, Morter
Tools:
Hammer, Screw Driver
-------------
My first thought is that perhaps this could be done with a certain type of library. But I'm not really sure right away as to which way would be good for going with this.
At this point, this is more or less just a suggestion/discussion type item, not really something definitely being implemented.
Thanks for any thoughts/suggestions/references.
--
"If to err is human, then I must be some kind of human!" -Me