Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chris Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Best practices on SBS for Hard Drive

Status
Not open for further replies.

dphoneguy24

Technical User
Oct 30, 2003
793
US
Using a hardware RAID - should I have the OS on 2 drives in a RAID 1 and then maybe 3 other drives (minimum) in a RAID 5 for the data store? Should the RAID 1 (OS) drive be partitioned in any particular way?
Should the RAID 5 array be partitioned in any special way?

Small amount of users probably will be going with SBS 2008 server - would like everyone's documents on the Server + will need quite a bit of room for shared folders/files.

Any input is appreciated.

Thanks
 
Should the RAID 1 (OS) drive be partitioned in any particular way?"
Raid 1 is inherently the safest raid config without spending a great deal of money. Unless lightning, major power surge, or a firmware bug hits the machine, odds of two drives dying in a raid 1, in a short time (say a week or two) are near astronomical. Get small drives for this, say roughly 30 Gig or more, place the OS, program installations and copy installation CD to a folder.
If you get larger drives I would partition the drive, say 40Gig for the OS, remainder for whatever. You want the OS separated from everything else primarily for organization, and file security; also helps in case your system get a virus or malware (easier cleanup).

"then maybe 3 other drives (minimum) in a RAID 5 for the data store"
You could add another raid 1 or a raid 5. Raid 5 will give you a higher read rate than a raid 1 but there is a write penalty due to parity creation, which on a small network is not a major factor, as caching on raid adapters helps to eliminate the issue; on a heavily stress servers, the write penalty is an issue. Also on raid 5, I would use 4 drives as a minimum, the added drive increases throughput over a 3 drive raid 5.

Perhaps it might be wise to get all the drives the same size, purchasing a spare which you use as a "global spare" in the raid setup...should one of the drives in either array fails, the global spare would automatically take it's place...basically how I setup arrays.



........................................
Chernobyl disaster..a must see pictorial
 
If you get larger drives I would partition the drive, say 40Gig for the OS, remainder for whatever.
Such as just the swap file.

If you can afford more drives, I'd go for RAID 1+0 for everything but the OS/paging volumes.

I like to have drives dedicated to Exchange, but that might not be practical for a really small shop. The number of users wasn't specified.

Pat Richard MVP
Plan for performance, and capacity takes care of itself. Plan for capacity, and suffer poor performance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top