Hi,
I was recently asked to perform a number of backup operations by, in order not to upset anyone in Seattle, my "client" . I was only allowed to use SSMS, which may not have been installed correctly as many of the features were unavailable .
[blue]1.
My "client" instructed me to perform a backup to capture all activity since the last transaction log backup, however the database in question was fixed in simple Recovery Mode.[/blue]
My "client" was very unhelpful in explaining the requirement further so i opted for a Full backup, appending to the exisiting media stipulated by my "client".
[blue]2.
My "client" assked me to perform another backup since the last Transaction Log backup, again on a DB fixed in Simple Recovery Mode but this time making the resulting backup file as small as possible.[/blue]
Again no further info was forthcoming from my "client" and i opted for a Differential backup, Over writing the existing media set.
[blue]3.
My "client asked me to perform a backup capturing all activity since the last transaction Log backup, again keeping the resulting file size to a minimum and again on a DB fixed in Simple Recovery mode, however this particular DB was used in Replication which shouldn't be affected by the backup.[/blue]
Again no further info was available so I opted for a full backup appending to the exiting media.
My "client" didn't tell me whether or not my particular solutions were correct or not, merly that i needed to do better overall...
My initial feelings were that these questions we're misleading as to my knowledge, it isn't possible to perform a Log backup in Simple Recovery mode, or could this have been an attempt by my "client" to catch me out?
Also, are there other ways of keeping the backup files small, other than what i did?
Finally, how would my backup routines affect Replication?
How would anyone else have approached this particular task... maybe you've been asked to do the same thing by one of your "clients"?
Any suggestions would be gratefully received.
Cheers,
Leigh
The problem with common sense is that it isn't that common!
I was recently asked to perform a number of backup operations by, in order not to upset anyone in Seattle, my "client" . I was only allowed to use SSMS, which may not have been installed correctly as many of the features were unavailable .
[blue]1.
My "client" instructed me to perform a backup to capture all activity since the last transaction log backup, however the database in question was fixed in simple Recovery Mode.[/blue]
My "client" was very unhelpful in explaining the requirement further so i opted for a Full backup, appending to the exisiting media stipulated by my "client".
[blue]2.
My "client" assked me to perform another backup since the last Transaction Log backup, again on a DB fixed in Simple Recovery Mode but this time making the resulting backup file as small as possible.[/blue]
Again no further info was forthcoming from my "client" and i opted for a Differential backup, Over writing the existing media set.
[blue]3.
My "client asked me to perform a backup capturing all activity since the last transaction Log backup, again keeping the resulting file size to a minimum and again on a DB fixed in Simple Recovery mode, however this particular DB was used in Replication which shouldn't be affected by the backup.[/blue]
Again no further info was available so I opted for a full backup appending to the exiting media.
My "client" didn't tell me whether or not my particular solutions were correct or not, merly that i needed to do better overall...
My initial feelings were that these questions we're misleading as to my knowledge, it isn't possible to perform a Log backup in Simple Recovery mode, or could this have been an attempt by my "client" to catch me out?
Also, are there other ways of keeping the backup files small, other than what i did?
Finally, how would my backup routines affect Replication?
How would anyone else have approached this particular task... maybe you've been asked to do the same thing by one of your "clients"?
Any suggestions would be gratefully received.
Cheers,
Leigh
The problem with common sense is that it isn't that common!