Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Avaya IP Office - Security Login (SSA) - Hacking attemps successful 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

blue42comz

Programmer
Feb 27, 2012
14
AU
Hi All,

Hoping someone can shed some light.

We have notice a large spike in hacking attempts on our Avaya IPO's - all coming from the same external IP address (5.189.138.135).

All systems have unique passwords and all unused accounts have been disabled/deleted.

However, we have recently seen that SSA is showing "success" for "Security Login" and no further details. See below...

SSA_Security_Login_itv0et.jpg


** We have multiple examples of the above.

So far, it appears to be R10 & R11 systems that are showing "Success" to "Security Login". I am wondering if this is a new vulnerability to the Avaya IPO's?

We have 1 confirmed system that has programming changes made (ICR was re-routed to an overseas number).

In addition, i have found many other users reporting the same issue. See below...


Your assistance with understanding this issue, is greatly appreciated.

Kind regards
 
I am wondering if this is a new vulnerability to the Avaya IPO's?

If you have public IPs on the systems or forwarded ports so you can reach them it's not a vulnerability if someone else tries to hack them.

"Trying is the first step to failure..." - Homer
 
* for Janni & Intrigant

It is considered bets practice to never expose the IP office to the public internet unless absolutely essential (& there are very few reasons why this should ever be so).

if direct access fro the internet is required (ie for a NAT* Remote Worker) then the absolute minimum of ports should be open - ideally restricted to only known IP addresses.

An SBC is strongly recommended for inbound & outbound SiP connections.


*NAT Traversal Remote handsets. I would strongly discourage the use of this technology as 96xx handsets as a VPN solution is far more robust (VPN software is included in the 96XX handsets & incurs no additional licencing cost).
the cost of a VPN router is far less than the cost of a sucsesfull hacking attempt.


Do things on the cheap & it will cost you dear
 
IPGuru said:
the cost of a VPN router is far less than the cost of a sucsesfull hacking attempt.
True, in one weekend it will cost the customer 10.000 euro or more if the line provider does not monitor exessive call rates.
 
intrigrant said:
True, in one weekend it will cost the customer 10.000 euro or more if the line provider does not monitor exessive call rates.


Or if you installed the system in such a way as to make it insecure then it may cost YOU 10,000 euro :)



“Some humans would do anything to see if it was possible to do it. If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying 'End-of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH', the paint wouldn't even have time to dry.”

Terry Pratchet
 
Thanks for feedback.

To be more specific.

If the security settings have been updated (all default passwords changed and all unused Users disabled/deleted).

- How is SSA logging "Security Login" = "Success"?
- And, Why are the [PC IP Address] , [PC MAC Address] & [PC Login User Name] fields blank?

FYI. Port forwards have now been disabled.

Kind regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top