a few questions:
openbsd proactivily audits, 40 vulnerabilities all up, slackware is insecure by default and only has thirty, someone care to explain?
if i were to make a linux distro using secure alternitives to every service, eg qmail, vsftpd etc etc, would that be more/just as secure as openbsd?
mandatory acces controls, surely anystem using these controls is more secure than a system using DAC?
openbsd proactivily audits, 40 vulnerabilities all up, slackware is insecure by default and only has thirty, someone care to explain?
if i were to make a linux distro using secure alternitives to every service, eg qmail, vsftpd etc etc, would that be more/just as secure as openbsd?
mandatory acces controls, surely anystem using these controls is more secure than a system using DAC?