Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Another CLID question

Status
Not open for further replies.

zstic78

Technical User
Sep 29, 2006
101
US
I know there a TON of CLID threads here and I have gone through a lot of them, but this is a little different.
First let me say that we are using Nuance Speech Attendant for name dialing. Which does work station to station. We have Ascendent MVS running so the desk number appears on the users blackberry.
Here is the issue, when the speech directory is dialed, the name is said and the system dials the desk, but instead of showing the calling ext/name it shows the ext of the Nuance system. Now if the called ext is not a MVS user the calling party info is displayed.

Here are the details
Person A dials 6363 to get to the speech directory. 6363 is a phantom with DCFW to 7200.
The speech directory looks up and dials the users ext. 6836. Now 6363 is a CDP to the MVS server out Route 26. The MVS server looks up 6836 and sends to the user’s desk which in this case would be 306836, and the phone rings back though route 26, as well as the blackberry , but the name and number displayed it Nuance 7200.

Calling direct station to station will display the correct CLID, which leads me to believe something is missing on the link from Nuance to MVS. As I said I have gone through a bunch of the current threads and made changes to the CLS such as changing to TDD CNDA DNDA on the 7200 set, but nothing changes.



Here are the print outs of the stations and route

Speech Directory main number
DES STS
TN 160 0 00 03 PHANTOM
TYPE 500
CDEN 4D
CUST 0
ERL 00000
WRLS NO
DN 6363 0 MARP
CPND
NAME NUANCE STS
XPLN 20
DISPLAY_FMT FIRST,LAST
AST NO
IAPG 0
HUNT
TGAR 1
LDN NO
NCOS 5
SGRP 0
RNPG 0
XLST
SCI 0
SCPW
CLS UNR DTN FBD XFD WTA THFD FND HTD ONS
LPR XRD AGRD CWD SWD MWD RMMD SMWD LPD XHD SLKD CCSD LND TVD
CFTD SFD MRD C6D CNID CLBD AUTU
ICDD CDMD LLCN EHTD MCTD
GPUD DPUD CFXA ARHA OVDD AGTD CLTD LDTD ASCD SDND
MBXD CPFA CPTA DDGA NAMA MIND
MCRD
EXR0 SHL ABDD CFHD DNDY DNO3
CWND USMD USRD BNRD OCBD RTDD RBDD RBHD FAXD CNUD CNAD PGND FTTC
CDMR MCDD T87D PKCH MPTD
PLEV 02
AACS NO
MLWU_LANG 0
FTR DCFW 4 7200
DATE 26 JUL 2007

DES STS
TN 052 0 13 11
TYPE 2616
CDEN 8D
CTYP XDLC
CUST 0
AOM 0
ERL 0
FDN 7201
TGAR 1
LDN NO
NCOS 5
SGRP 0
RNPG 0
SCI 0
SSU
XLST
SCPW
CLS CTD FBD WTA LPR MTD FNA HTA TDD HFD
MWD LMPN RMMD SMWD AAD IMD XHD IRD NID OLD VCE DRG1
POD DSX VMD SLKD CCSD SWD LND CNDA
CFTD SFD MRD DDV CNID CDCA MSID DAPA BFED RCBD
ICDD CDMD LLCN MCTD CLBD AUTU
GPUD DPUD DNDA CFXA ARHD FITD CLTD ASCD
CPFA CPTA ABDD CFHD FICD NAID BUZZ AGRD MOAD AHD
DDGA NAMA
DRDD EXR0
USMD USRD ULAD RTDD RBDD RBHD PGND OCBD FLXD FTTC DNDY DNO3 MCBN
CDMR MCDD T87D PKCH
CPND_LANG ENG
RCO 0
HUNT 7201
LHK 0
PLEV 02
DANI NO
AST
IAPG 0
AACS NO
ITNA NO
DGRP
MLWU_LANG 0
DNDR 0
KEY 00 SCR 7200 720 MARP
CPND
NAME NUANCE STS
XPLN 20
DISPLAY_FMT FIRST,LAST
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15 TRN
DATE 25 JAN 2011

Route 26
TYPE RDB
CUST 00
ROUT 26
DES MOBILITY
TKTP TIE
M911P NO
ESN NO
CNVT NO
SAT NO
RCLS EXT
VTRK NO
NODE
DTRK YES
BRIP NO
DGTP PRI
ISDN YES
MODE PRA
IFC ISGF
SBN NO
PNI 00101
NCNA NO
NCRD NO
CHTY BCH
CTYP NPA
INAC NO
ISAR NO
CPFXS YES
DAPC NO
INTC NO
MBXR NO
DSEL VOD
PTYP PRI
AUTO NO
DNIS NO
DCDR YES
ICOG IAO
SRCH LIN
TRMB NO
STEP
ACOD 8826
TCPP NO
TARG 01
CLEN 10
BILN NO
OABS
INST
IDC NO
DCNO 0 *
NDNO 0
DEXT NO
ANTK
SIGO STD
ICIS YES
TIMR ICF 512
OGF 512
EOD 13952
NRD 10112
DDL 70
ODT 4096
RGV 640
GRD 896
SFB 3
NBS 2048
NBL 4096
IENB 5
TFD 0
VSS 0
VGD 6
DRNG NO
CDR YES
INC YES
LAST YES
QREC NO
OAL YES
AIA NO
OAN YES
OPD NO
CDRX NO
NATL YES
VRAT NO
MUS NO
FRL 0 0
FRL 1 0
FRL 2 0
FRL 3 0
FRL 4 0
FRL 5 0
FRL 6 0
FRL 7 0
OHQ NO
OHQT 00
CBQ NO
AUTH NO
TDET NO
TTBL 0
ATAN NO
PLEV 2
ALRM NO
ART 0
SGRP 0
ARDN NO
AACR NO

DCH 26
ADAN DCH 26
CTYP MSDL
GRP 0
DNUM 7
PORT 2
DES MOBILITY
USR PRI
DCHL 26
OTBF 32
PARM RS422 DTE
DRAT 64KC
CLOK EXT
IFC ISGF
PINX_CUST 0
ISDN_MCNT 300
CLID OPT0
CO_TYPE STD
SIDE NET
CNEG 1
RLS ID 25
RCAP COLP NDI PRI DV3I CTI
PR_TRIGS DIV 2 3
CNG 2 3
PR_RTN YES
MBGA NO
OVLR NO
OVLS NO
T310 120
T200 3
T203 10
N200 3
N201 260
K 7

DSC config
FEAT cdp
TYPE dsc
DSC 6836
DSC 6836
FLEN 4
DSP LSC
RLI 9
NPA
NXX

MVS RLI
RLI 9
ENTR 0
LTER NO
ROUT 26
TOD 0 ON 1 ON 2 ON 3 ON
4 ON 5 ON 6 ON 7 ON
VNS NO
CNV NO
EXP NO
FRL 0
DMI 0
FCI 0
FSNI 0
SBOC NRR
IDBB DBD
IOHQ NO
OHQ NO
CBQ NO
ISET 0
NALT 5
MFRL 0
OVLL 0

ANY thoughts would be appreciated!!!!
 
It looks like it is displaying the correct information, as you are dialing the 7200 where the nuance system terminates the call (although it does additional transfers) It would seem to me, and this is only an opinion as I have never used this system, that if you want more information, the Nuance system will have to pass it back to the PBX so it can deliver it on to the caller/called #.
As I said, this is only an opinion .....
 
Thanks trvlr1 any opinions are valued.
The "transferred call " is delivered back to the PBX, thought to a different ext 30xxxx. Internally (calls not routed to the MVS server) the CLID is the calling person after being transferred from Nuance. I can take any of the MVS users out of the DSC and it works correctly. That is why I am thinking it is something it the RDB maybe????
 
The thought that keeps going through my head is that this is an external device, so unless it is connected via PRI circuits (or similar) with the internal ability to pass this information, it will not be able to do it. It seems to be acting like it is conferencing the two calls together rather than transferring the calls.
Again this is only my opinion to keep the thread open until someone with some real knowledge comes along and gives us both the right answer! :)
 
Interesting thought.... I will make another call and trace 7200, and check that.
 
We have a similar configuration (CS1000E RLS6.0, Speech Attendant, and MVS). And we have the same issue.

The connection between CS1000E and MVS is a PRI.
 
Might want to try different ARDN choices in the RDB. I have had some success with this in other CLID/redirection issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top