I suggest a further search, Even within Tek-Tips, you can easily find numerous threads discussing the subject in general. In particular, you should note the issues with the already presented (above) quasi soloution and a number of alternatives which overcome these.
Poos is just being slpooy with spelling OOPS. Seems, to me, that if you are advertising that a procedure return the AGE from the DOB, it should consider the possabilities. Shouldn't it LIMIT the answer? You obviously recognize that the first 364 days (or so) do not constitute a Year(of age), so why would the previous 364 days (or any subsset thereof) constitute a year(of Age)?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.