I have searched many threads on here, and many seem to suggest changing the MTU. Here is my scenario:
Basically I am running 2 VPN's to 2 remote offices, over SDSL, and they're connection keeps dropping (eg Outlook constantly loses its connection). Also, when I try to remote desktop to one of their pc's, I only get about 30 seconds out of it, then lose the connection. Surfing the internet on both sides is absolutely fine, so I'm guessing its nothing to do with our SDSL itself.
Each of the 3 sites has a D-Link firewall, of which allow you to change the MTU. I have ascertained that our optimum is 1424, using TCPoptimizer.
My first question is: Is it enough to just change the MTU's on each firewall, or do you need to do it on the remote client's pc too?
I have tried changing the MTU to 1424 on all firewalls, and also on my own pc (using a registry change I found on here), but having tried another remote desktop connection, the problem is still happening.
My second question is: Is it worth me trying to lower it any further, and if so, how low should you realistically go? I have heard 576 mentioned.
And thirdly, could it be something else? Any help would be much appreciated.
Basically I am running 2 VPN's to 2 remote offices, over SDSL, and they're connection keeps dropping (eg Outlook constantly loses its connection). Also, when I try to remote desktop to one of their pc's, I only get about 30 seconds out of it, then lose the connection. Surfing the internet on both sides is absolutely fine, so I'm guessing its nothing to do with our SDSL itself.
Each of the 3 sites has a D-Link firewall, of which allow you to change the MTU. I have ascertained that our optimum is 1424, using TCPoptimizer.
My first question is: Is it enough to just change the MTU's on each firewall, or do you need to do it on the remote client's pc too?
I have tried changing the MTU to 1424 on all firewalls, and also on my own pc (using a registry change I found on here), but having tried another remote desktop connection, the problem is still happening.
My second question is: Is it worth me trying to lower it any further, and if so, how low should you realistically go? I have heard 576 mentioned.
And thirdly, could it be something else? Any help would be much appreciated.