Hi Group:
I've got an Access 2000 application that I'm building and everytime I turn around the db is corrupt. It seems to be happening when I copy and paste onto my thumb drive to bring home. At work, I'm developing on an 2000 version, when I get home I'm on an XP version. I've been carful to use the older versions of the ADO libraries and I'm not using any Active-X controls. I've been very careful to make back-up copies but it's a pain in the ol' keester as I'm tired of re-creating the work that I did at work! I'm pretty sure that the error is coming from mass deletes out of the tables before I bring the db home. My most recent error is AOIndex doesn't exist.
Any ideas on how I can avoid this problem going forward? Is 2000 as stable as XP, 97, or 2.0? Over the years I can count only a handful of times where a db became corrupt? Would it be a correct statement to say that 97 followed by XP was by far the most stable platform . . . my experience would say yes.
Thanks for any insight!
I've got an Access 2000 application that I'm building and everytime I turn around the db is corrupt. It seems to be happening when I copy and paste onto my thumb drive to bring home. At work, I'm developing on an 2000 version, when I get home I'm on an XP version. I've been carful to use the older versions of the ADO libraries and I'm not using any Active-X controls. I've been very careful to make back-up copies but it's a pain in the ol' keester as I'm tired of re-creating the work that I did at work! I'm pretty sure that the error is coming from mass deletes out of the tables before I bring the db home. My most recent error is AOIndex doesn't exist.
Any ideas on how I can avoid this problem going forward? Is 2000 as stable as XP, 97, or 2.0? Over the years I can count only a handful of times where a db became corrupt? Would it be a correct statement to say that 97 followed by XP was by far the most stable platform . . . my experience would say yes.
Thanks for any insight!