Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations SkipVought on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

a relationship that is non obligatory on the 'many 'side

Status
Not open for further replies.

ngoz1

Programmer
Apr 19, 2002
19
0
0
GB
i think you may have misunderstood my question( though you also cleared some confusions i had about cascade joins)
let me rephrase my question:
i read some where that :

a sperate relationship table is required for any many to many relationship(which i agree with)
i also read that for a 1:m relationship - if the many entity type is non obligatory you must also define three tables(ie one table for each of the entities and one for the the relationship- this is the table i was referring to, as the join table) -is this true or rather necessary!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top