WE are running Macola 7.6 and Progression 7.6.200. We have several suppliers that require us to place orders with one entity, but remit payment to a separate, but related entity. An example would be material we buy from Gray Matter Systems (a division of GE) - we are required to place a PO with Gray Matter, but invoices are generated by and payments must be remitted to GE Fanuc Americas, Inc. at a separate address. We use the PO & receiving system in Macola extensively.
I'm relatively new to Macola, but not to A/P systems in general. All past systems I've worked with had a alternate remit-to address capability specificically for this situation. I see an alternate vendor address in Macola, but don't yet see a way to incorporate that into the check writing process. It would seem my only recourse is to set up a separate remit-to vendor, and process the receivers and invoices against that (if Macola will allow that). The only issue I have with this scenario is that PO history and payment history then reside under two different vendor names.
Progression help file doesn't shed much light on whether the alternate vendor address can be used for this or not. Any additional info I can get would be greatly appreciated
I'm relatively new to Macola, but not to A/P systems in general. All past systems I've worked with had a alternate remit-to address capability specificically for this situation. I see an alternate vendor address in Macola, but don't yet see a way to incorporate that into the check writing process. It would seem my only recourse is to set up a separate remit-to vendor, and process the receivers and invoices against that (if Macola will allow that). The only issue I have with this scenario is that PO history and payment history then reside under two different vendor names.
Progression help file doesn't shed much light on whether the alternate vendor address can be used for this or not. Any additional info I can get would be greatly appreciated