Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations SkipVought on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

8 bits/channel compared to 16/bits per channel

Status
Not open for further replies.

kentucky

Technical User
Nov 5, 2002
174
0
0
US
after upgrading to cs2. i noticed my pics default on rgb - 8 bits per channel. For printwork, when i convert to cmyk should I click on 16 bits/channel or does it matter.
thanks.
 
You should only use 16 bits if your output device or workflow supports it.

If an image is loaded as 8-bit, switching to 16-bit does not improve it and just adds file size.
 
So if you start a new document just leave it at 8 or change that to 16 ???
 
If you know that your output is capable of 16-bit then you can start new documents or edit existing 16-bit images in 16-bit.

The reason that Photoshop defaults to 8-bit is because the majority of output is 8-bit.
 
If an image is loaded as 8-bit, switching to 16-bit does not improve it and just adds file size.

True, but sometimes if you have to make drastic global adjustments to an image, converting to 16-bit mode first reduces the quantization errors that can cause noise and gaps in your histogram. In general, it doesn't give a noticable advantage, but sometimes it's worth keeping in mind for troublesome images.
 
Actually, I think the input device should be the control. If the input device supports more than 8 bits, and the image warrants additional precision, I retain it. If you don't, you are throwing away color information. Both my camera and my scanner support more than 8 bits.

I don't see a lot of reason to convert an 8 bit image to 16 bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top