I did a search but wasn't able to come up with a definitve answer......so if I may I'd like to know if I need the DHCP role installed on our 2003 server machine.
This a small network, and the 03 server will be used only as a domain controller, that will replace our existing Windows NT domain controller and file server, leaving the NT machine simply as a file server and to be used for backups.
Okay we have a broadband DSL modem connected to our cisco switch along with about 18 machines, along with the NT D.C and F.S, and more recently the 2003 server machine as I'm implementing and testing the D.C. role. After I finally got the test domain setup and connected to it I notiched I was getting a 192.xxx.xxx.xxx IP address as opposed to a 10.xxx.xxx.xxx range which is what I set up in DHCP scope. Therefore leading me to believe that the broadband modem is issuing the IP address. So is it the case that I don't really need the DHCP role on the 2003 server machine, if I really only need it to function as a Domain Controller??
This a small network, and the 03 server will be used only as a domain controller, that will replace our existing Windows NT domain controller and file server, leaving the NT machine simply as a file server and to be used for backups.
Okay we have a broadband DSL modem connected to our cisco switch along with about 18 machines, along with the NT D.C and F.S, and more recently the 2003 server machine as I'm implementing and testing the D.C. role. After I finally got the test domain setup and connected to it I notiched I was getting a 192.xxx.xxx.xxx IP address as opposed to a 10.xxx.xxx.xxx range which is what I set up in DHCP scope. Therefore leading me to believe that the broadband modem is issuing the IP address. So is it the case that I don't really need the DHCP role on the 2003 server machine, if I really only need it to function as a Domain Controller??